Skip to content
+Shield Programme

+Shield Programme

Multi-tier, AI-powered counter-UAS and force protection ecosystem — from loitering munitions to hypersonic threats.

PUBLIC

Four pillars

COST ASYMMETRY

SwarmWall intercepts at a fraction of conventional missile defence cost. Patriot PAC-3: ~$4M per intercept. +Shield: orders of magnitude less.

HUMAN-IN-THE-LOOP

Fully autonomous lethal engagement is a hard red line. Every kill decision authorised by a human operator through +ROP biometric authentication.

SOVEREIGN BY DESIGN

Zero US-dependency communications. Five-layer +Grid stack: LoRa FHSS, UWB, SDR, OneWeb/Eutelsat, acoustic infrasound.

NATO PROCUREMENT READY

Built against NATO STANAG specifications. EU-manufactured. Compatible with allied vehicle and naval platforms.

Tier matrix

Tier Threat Indicative cost Status Detail
T1 +Shield Basic
Loitering munitions, small UAS €45K Concept Read more →
T2 +Eiffel full stack
UAS swarms, layered air defence €80K Concept Read more →
T3 +Ballistic
Cruise missile interception Research Read more →
T4 +Ground
Counter-armoured vehicle Research Read more →
T5 +Hypersonic
Hypersonic intercept Research Read more →
+N +N
Restricted — international legal authorisation Restricted Read more →

The cost equation is broken

European airspace is contested. Loitering munitions, cruise missiles, and increasingly hypersonic vehicles outpace legacy air defence economics. Defenders cannot sustain $4M intercept costs against $20K attack drones. +Shield reverses the cost equation.

~$4M per intercept against a $20K drone. That equation is unsustainable.
— Patriot PAC-3 vs. attack UAS

Human-in-the-loop is non-negotiable

No +Shield system performs autonomous lethal engagement. A human operator authorises every kill decision via +ROP biometric authentication. This doctrine is engineered into the architecture, not bolted on.

Request a technical briefing

For NATO DIANA evaluators, allied procurement, and defence partners.